I normally don’t bother just adding a link to another story, but in this particularly nasty time when we have a rather astonishing number of outright lies being circulated in an attempt to make sure the incumbent wins election, and when you have the Speaker of the House of Representatives issuing politically-motivated slander, this one bears linking to: “At least” 90% chance that the CBS National Guard documents are fake.
Updated: The more I read, the more convinced I am that they are, in fact, forgeries, and not particularly good ones. Given that, the question becomes, of course, who is responsible?
I hate this campaign.
posted 15:28They are in fact certainly fake. No typewriter in existence at the time (1973) could do superscripts in the way that they appear on these documents, for example, on the unit designations.
As you say, this is a Bush plant designed to take the issue away from the Democrats as a drum-to-beat.
Posted by: Jacob Levy at September 11, 2004 10:08 AMOK after posting I did a bit more reseach (haha, everyone accusing everyone of not doing research and fact checking, so... )
I found this: http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200409\POL20040910e.html
There Dan Rather points out that other documents already released by the White House also contain these superscripted unit designations.
OK, so you gotta ask: is the whole set of documents fake, from A to Z? or is everything legit? You apparently shouldn't be able to have it both ways..
Posted by: Jacob Levy at September 11, 2004 10:14 AM